Black people are stupid and criminal, says BBC

Or at least, apparently now it will if you tell it to. I got the most extraordinary email today. I'd been watching Breakfast news a few days ago, and was startled to hear one of the newsreaders assert, as part of a report on the progress of the Digital Economy Bill, that "music piracy costs the music industry hundreds of millions of pounds a year".

Since there has, of course, never been a single shred of evidence produced anywhere by anyone ever proving that this is the case, I was somewhat disturbed to hear the BBC suddenly reporting this claim as an absolute fact, without any sort of "the industry claims that…" qualifier in front of it. So I sent off an email via the BBC website politely expressing my concerns.

I expected an apologetic "Live show, regrettable oversight/slip of the tongue"-type response, but the reply I received this afternoon really made me blink.
 

"Dear Mr Campbell

Thanks for your e-mail regarding 'Breakfast' on BBC One. I understand you believe the bulletin on 24 March broadcast "unsubstantiated" claims that illegal filesharing costs the music industry hundreds of millions of pounds each year.

While we appreciate your concerns, a recent study by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) says that filesharing costs the industry £200million a year:

http://www.bpi.co.uk/

Please note the BBC isn't responsible for content found on external sites.

We don't aim for a balance of opinion within one single item or programme as it's not always possible or practical. Instead, we provide this balance over a period of time across our entire news and current affairs output.

Nonetheless, your complaint will be added to our audience log, a daily report of audience feedback that's circulated to many BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers.

The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

Regards

Andrew Hannah
BBC Complaints"

 

So let's get this straight. If the BNP, say, was to concoct some "study" arriving at the conclusion that all black people had sub-90 IQs and were congenitally inclined to criminality, and sent the results to the BBC, it would be reported on the news as fact?

Bill Turnbull, we're apparently to believe, would sit there with his serious face on and say "Black people are congenitally stupid and inclined to criminality, and because of this fact the BNP have called for the law to be changed in order to have them all forcibly deported to Africa".

BUT, it would be okay because at some unspecified time somewhere else in the BBC's news and current affairs output  (perhaps the graveyard shift on BBC Radio Humberside) someone might suggest that actually, black people WEREN'T all lawless brain-dead thugs. Phew!

As a dark Murdoch-shaped shadow looms over the BBC's future, the corporation sometimes seems to be going out of its way to portray itself as something that isn't worth fighting for. And if its journalistic standards have truly been degraded so far as to reduce it to an unquestioning mouthpiece for vested commercial interests and their worthless bullshit propaganda, Murdoch might as well have it and change its name to Fox UK.

On the other hand, if all you have to do to get something reported as a fact by the national broadcasting network now is produce your own completely spurious "study" on it, we could all have a lot of fun. I've dropped them another line just now, asking what address we should send stuff to that we want read out as news without anyone caring about whether it's remotely true or not. When I get the reply, I'll let you all know.

Advertisements

11 Responses to “Black people are stupid and criminal, says BBC”

  1. I've noticed (and commented on) the increasing amount of bias in the BBC's news reporting for some time. What I don't understand is why more people don't question it.

    I guess that while a person can be intelligent, people are dumb motherfuckers who believe whatever they're TOLD to believe.

  2. Bloody good point mate.

  3. TigerTiger Says:

    Noticed this on the cover of Music Week recently:
    http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=1040483
    "Piracy could cost UK 10,000 jobs"
    Unfortunately you have to subscribe to get the full article, but I had a quick scan of the printed version and as far as I could see it failed to substantiate this claim. Surely if piracy was going to cause so much unemployment it would have happened already, not like people haven't been file sharing for years.

  4. And as we all know, Home Taping did indeed kill music.

  5. Rev for PM Says:

    Spot on, Stu. You are not alone in your feelings. I see someone else in the comments here has noticed the drop in standards too.

    What worries me more though are the people who don't notice anything wrong at all and so lap it all up and file it away as "facts and truth". Every one of those people is proof that their efforts and methods work.

    Same sort of problem with the newspapers, mind. They're not even worth wrapping your chips up in any more.

  6. Looking at the BPI website, the BPI doesn't even say file sharing costs the industry £200m a year – they say it cost "an estimated" £200m in 2009 – see http://www.bpi.co.uk/our-work/protecting-uk-music/article/online-faqs.aspx. This"estimated" is quite an important word here (which I presume the BBC didn't quote?) – because it is simply an estimate, the actual answer could lie anywhere from £0 (or even better if people who download music then buy stuff they wouldn't have otherwise heard about etc.) to an even higher number than £200m.

  7. The problem is that the BBC aggressively pursues its own copyright infringements on YouTube and other video-sharing sites. Therefore ANYTHING to do with perceived IP infringement, whether it actually costs the holder or not (which is moot), will be top news. Public Broadcaster, ME ARSE

  8. It's this kind of blind acceptance of "facts" that leads people (like my ISP) to start claiming that all filesharing is illegal, because most people believe that is, and so accept that they're not allowed to do it, regardless of the files they are sharing.

  9. Sounds like typical BBC to me – I got quite irritated when one of the presenters started asking Cameron how they were going to fund the 'tax cut', referring to the 'not putting all of a rise in' National Insurance pledge.

  10. Aunt Powder Says:

    Time to get rid of Auntie Beeb, quite frankly. I've seen it rot over the years and now it's at an all-time low. I am sick of the blatantly biased coverage, the selective reporting and burying of stories and the general low-quality that fills the airwaves. I don't see why I should be forced through the telly tax to pay for something I don't want.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: